Trainyard vs PIPlanning.io

PIPlanning.io: on premises or separate server; priced by team. Trainyard: open source, self-hosted with no limits or hosted; priced per trainer or per train, with the people in the room free.

TrainyardPIPlanning.io
HostingSelf-hosted, open source; hosted; Jira app and Azure DevOps extensionOn premises or separate server
PI planningIntegrated: PI planning, team breakouts, PI objectives, confidence voteDedicated tool
ART and team boardsART and team boards, PI planning board with milestones and dependency strings, ROAM, WSJF, retrospectivesART and ROAM boards
Beyond planningPortfolio Kanban, roadmaps, SAFe canvases, value stream identification and mapping, AI portfolio, dashboardsNone
IntegrationJira and Azure DevOps, two ways; imports from iObeya, Miro, Mural, monday.comJira
Priced byTrainer or train; people in the room are freeTeam

When PIPlanning.io is the better pick

PIPlanning.io is the better pick when you want a dedicated PI planning board with little else around it and a per-team price.

When Trainyard is

  • The room holds people who are not tracker users: business owners, customers, a class. Trainyard counts trainers or trains, so they cost nothing.
  • The plan must flow back to Jira or Azure DevOps and come from it: features, stories, risks and dependencies sync two ways through an inspectable queue.
  • You need more than the board: Portfolio Kanban, value stream identification and mapping, SAFe canvases, PI Outcome Planning, an AI-native portfolio, dashboards.
  • You host your own tools, or want to be able to: one Docker Compose, Apache-2.0, every feature.
  • You train: Leading SAFe, SPC, Advanced SPC, POPM and RTE class boards, and your own Miro class boards imported.

Moving boards over

Boards from iObeya, Miro, Mural, monday.com, Trello, CSV and JSON import as they are; Jira and Azure DevOps data syncs rather than imports.

Try Trainyard free →